[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3]
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 09:22:30PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> For 2) you can just use permission() instead of vfs_permission() which
> is exactly the same in this case (and consolidated into a common
> function later in the vfs-cleanups tree).

Miklos, don't delude people into thinking the vfs-cleanups tree is ever
going to get merged in its current state. Al's NAKed the path_* stuff,
Christoph's NAKed it too. Ignoring them and putting up a VFS tree of
your own is not going to help matters.

Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-30 21:35    [W:0.104 / U:1.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site