Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by: | From | Valdis.Kletnieks@vt ... | Date | Fri, 01 Jun 2007 01:32:03 -0400 |
| |
On Thu, 31 May 2007 19:09:10 PDT, akpm@linux-foundation.org said:
> +If a person was not directly involved in the preparation or handling of a > +patch but wishes to signify and record their approval of it then they can > +arrange to have an Acked-by: line added to the patch's changelog. > + > +Acked-by: is often used by the maintainer of the affected code when that > +maintainer neither wrote, merged nor forwarded the patch themselves.
Do we want to add verbiage saying that an Acked-By: is also useful when it comes from somebody (likely the original reporter) who has actually tested the patch?
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |