Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 2 Jun 2007 19:17:46 +0200 (MEST) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by: |
| |
On Jun 1 2007 14:28, Dave Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 07:09:10PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > > > > > > > Explain what we use Acked-by: for, and how it differs from Signed-off-by: > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > > > + > > > > +If a person was not directly involved in the preparation or handling of a > > > > +patch but wishes to signify and record their approval of it then they can > > > > +arrange to have an Acked-by: line added to the patch's changelog. > > > > > > Acked-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> > > > > What, no Tested-by: ? > >Heh. Indeed. I think there's room for both fwiw.
Too verbose. Suggest a typedef.
Signed-off-and-tested-by: Foo J. Bar <addy@corps>
Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |