Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:28:35 -0400 | From | Dave Jones <> | Subject | Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by: |
| |
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:22:25AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:14:14 -0400 > Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 07:09:10PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > > > > > Explain what we use Acked-by: for, and how it differs from Signed-off-by: > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > > + > > > +If a person was not directly involved in the preparation or handling of a > > > +patch but wishes to signify and record their approval of it then they can > > > +arrange to have an Acked-by: line added to the patch's changelog. > > > > Acked-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> > > What, no Tested-by: ?
Heh. Indeed. I think there's room for both fwiw.
Dave
-- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |