Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:54:28 -0800 | From | Zach Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHv4 5/6] Allow setting O_NONBLOCK flag for new sockets |
| |
David Miller wrote: > From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:53:14 -0500 > > FWIW, I think this indirect syscall stuff is the most ugly interface > I've ever seen proposed for the kernel.
Well, there's no XML in /proc :) :).
But, yes, I agree that the internal code needs a lot more cleanup before being considered for merging.
> And I agree with all of the objections raised by both H. Pater Anvin > and Eric Dumazet.
I'm worried, too. Do we have a stronger alternative? I'm all ears, this isn't really my area of expertise.
- z - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |