Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:55:56 -0800 | From | Zach Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHv4 5/6] Allow setting O_NONBLOCK flag for new sockets |
| |
>>> Where does this INDIRECT_PARAM() macro get defined? I do not >>> see it being defined anywhere in these patches. >> Defined in <linux/indirect.h>: >> >> +#define INDIRECT_PARAM(set, name) current->indirect_params.set.name >> >> Not my idea, I was following one review comment. > > This was not in the patches you posted, I double checked before > sending my reply.
Not to belabor this point, but it was:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/20/53
$ grep -l INDIRECT_PARAM .git/patches/master/* .git/patches/master/indirect-v4-4.patch .git/patches/master/indirect-v4-5.patch .git/patches/master/indirect-v4-6.patch
Maybe the patches got to you out of order so you saw 5/ before 4/?
- z
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |