Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Sun, 14 May 2006 16:30:38 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | [patch] Cleanups to Doc*/SubmittingPatches |
| |
This cleans up Submitting patches a bit. Missing/inconsistent full stops, mostly.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches index c2c85bc..07b87ce 100644 --- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches +++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches @@ -173,17 +173,17 @@ copy the maintainer when you change thei For small patches you may want to CC the Trivial Patch Monkey trivial@kernel.org managed by Adrian Bunk; which collects "trivial" patches. Trivial patches must qualify for one of the following rules: - Spelling fixes in documentation + Spelling fixes in documentation. Spelling fixes which could break grep(1). - Warning fixes (cluttering with useless warnings is bad) - Compilation fixes (only if they are actually correct) - Runtime fixes (only if they actually fix things) + Warning fixes (cluttering with useless warnings is bad). + Compilation fixes (only if they are actually correct). + Runtime fixes (only if they actually fix things). Removing use of deprecated functions/macros (eg. check_region). - Contact detail and documentation fixes + Contact detail and documentation fixes. Non-portable code replaced by portable code (even in arch-specific, - since people copy, as long as it's trivial) - Any fix by the author/maintainer of the file. (ie. patch monkey - in re-transmission mode) + since people copy, as long as it's trivial). + Any fix by the author/maintainer of the file (ie. patch monkey + in re-transmission mode). URL: <http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/bunk/trivial/> @@ -246,13 +246,13 @@ updated change. It is quite common for Linus to "drop" your patch without comment. That's the nature of the system. If he drops your patch, it could be due to -* Your patch did not apply cleanly to the latest kernel version +* Your patch did not apply cleanly to the latest kernel version. * Your patch was not sufficiently discussed on linux-kernel. -* A style issue (see section 2), -* An e-mail formatting issue (re-read this section) -* A technical problem with your change -* He gets tons of e-mail, and yours got lost in the shuffle -* You are being annoying (See Figure 1) +* A style issue (see section 2). +* An e-mail formatting issue (re-read this section). +* A technical problem with your change. +* He gets tons of e-mail, and yours got lost in the shuffle. +* You are being annoying. When in doubt, solicit comments on linux-kernel mailing list. @@ -475,22 +475,22 @@ SECTION 3 - REFERENCES Andrew Morton, "The perfect patch" (tpp). <http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt> -Jeff Garzik, "Linux kernel patch submission format." +Jeff Garzik, "Linux kernel patch submission format". <http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html> -Greg Kroah-Hartman "How to piss off a kernel subsystem maintainer". +Greg Kroah-Hartman, "How to piss off a kernel subsystem maintainer". <http://www.kroah.com/log/2005/03/31/> <http://www.kroah.com/log/2005/07/08/> <http://www.kroah.com/log/2005/10/19/> <http://www.kroah.com/log/2006/01/11/> -NO!!!! No more huge patch bombs to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org people!. +NO!!!! No more huge patch bombs to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org people! <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=112112749912944&w=2> -Kernel Documentation/CodingStyle +Kernel Documentation/CodingStyle: <http://sosdg.org/~coywolf/lxr/source/Documentation/CodingStyle> -Linus Torvald's mail on the canonical patch format: +Linus Torvalds's mail on the canonical patch format: <http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/4/7/183> -- Last updated on 17 Nov 2005. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |