lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich wrote:

> On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 14:05 -0800, David Lang wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 thockin@hockin.org wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 01:18:35PM -0800, David Lang wrote:
>>>> Lee, the last time I saw this discussion I thought it was identified that
>>>> the multiple cores (or IIRC the multiple chips in a SMP motherboard) would
>>>> only get out of sync when power management calls were made (hlt or
>>>> switching the c-state). IIRC the workaround that was posted then was to
>>>> just disable these in the kernel build.
>>>
>>> not using 'hlt' when idling means that you spend 10s of Watts more power
>>> on mostly idle systems.
>>
>> true, but for people who need better time accruacy then the other
>> workaround this may be very acceptable.
>>
>
> 1/4 KW / day for time synchronisation.
>
> The power company would love that.

more precisely 1/4 KW Hour / day

$0.01 - $0.02/day (I had to lookup the current rates)

they probably won't notice.

David Lang

--
There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies.
-- C.A.R. Hoare

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-13 23:52    [W:0.171 / U:0.296 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site