| Subject | Re: [0/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12 | From | Nigel Cunningham <> | Date | Thu, 07 Jul 2005 10:27:28 +1000 |
| |
Hi again.
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 18:22, Pavel Machek wrote: > Is swsusp1 expected to be functional after these are applied? You > removed *some* of its hooks, but not all, so I'm confused.
I've been thinking about this some more and wondering whether I should just replace swsusp. I really don't want to step on your toes though. What would you like to see happen?
Regards,
Nigel -- Evolution. Enumerate the requirements. Consider the interdependencies. Calculate the probabilities. Be amazed that people believe it happened.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|