| Date | Tue, 5 Jul 2005 21:42:42 -0600 (MDT) | From | Zwane Mwaikambo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] [24/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12: 601-kernel_power_power-header.patch |
| |
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> diff -ruNp 602-smp.patch-old/kernel/power/suspend2_core/smp.c 602-smp.patch-new/kernel/power/suspend2_core/smp.c > --- 602-smp.patch-old/kernel/power/suspend2_core/smp.c 1970-01-01 10:00:00.000000000 +1000 > +++ 602-smp.patch-new/kernel/power/suspend2_core/smp.c 2005-07-04 23:14:19.000000000 +1000 > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ > +#include <linux/sched.h> > + > +void ensure_on_processor_zero(void) > +{ > + set_cpus_allowed(current, cpumask_of_cpu(0)); > + BUG_ON(smp_processor_id() != 0); > +} > + > +void return_to_all_processors(void) > +{ > + set_cpus_allowed(current, CPU_MASK_ALL); > +}
Do we really need to wrap these?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|