Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:29:02 -0300 | From | Humberto Massa <> | Subject | Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice. |
| |
David Schmitt wrote:
> On Thursday 07 April 2005 09:25, Jes Sorensen wrote: > > > [snip] I got it from Alteon under a written agreement stating I > > could distribute the image under the GPL. Since the firmware is > > simply data to Linux, hence keeping it under the GPL should be just > > fine. > > > Then I would like to exercise my right under the GPL to aquire the > source code for the firmware (and the required compilers, starting > with genfw.c which is mentioned in acenic_firmware.h) since - as far > as I know - firmware is coded today in VHDL, C or some assembler and > the days of hexcoding are long gone.
First, there is *NOT* any requirement in the GPL at all that requires making compilers available. Otherwise it would not be possible, for instance, have a Visual Basic GPL'd application. And yes, it is possible.
Second, up until the present day I have personal experience with hardware producers that do not have enough money to buy expensive toolchains and used a lot of hand-work to code hardware parameters. So, at least for them, hand-hexcoding-days are still going.
HTH,
Massa
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |