Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice. | From | Josselin Mouette <> | Date | Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:15:45 +0200 |
| |
Le jeudi 07 avril 2005 à 09:03 -0400, Richard B. Johnson a écrit : > Well it doesn't make any difference. If GPL has degenerated to > where one can't upload microcode to a device as part of its > initialization, without having the "source" that generated that > microcode, we are in a lot of hurt. Intel isn't going to give their > designs away.
The GPL doesn't forbid that. The GPL forbids to put this microcode directly in the same binary as the GPL code. Of course, nothing forbids some GPL'ed code to take a binary elsewhere and to upload it into the hardware.
At least that's my opinion; AIUI, Sven Luther believes it is possible if the firmware has a decent (but not necessarily free) license. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |