Messages in this thread | | | From | (bill davidsen) | Subject | Re: 2.6.0 NFS-server low to 0 performance | Date | 7 Jan 2004 22:30:05 GMT |
| |
In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401071431520.479-100000@poirot.grange>, Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> wrote: | On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: | | > server with 2.6.0 kernel: | > | > fast:2.6.0-test11 2m21s (*) | > fast:2.4.20 16.5s | > SA1100:2.4 never finishes (*) | > PXA:2.4.21-rmk1-pxa1 as above | > PXA:2.6.0-rmk1-pxa as above | > | > server: 2.4.21 | > | > fast:2.6.0-test11 6s | > fast:2.4.20 5s | > SA1100:2.4.19-rmk7 3.22s | > PXA:2.4.21-rmk1-pxa1 7s | > PXA:2.6.0-rmk2-pxa 1) 50s (**) | > (***) 2) 27s (**) | | s/fast/PC2/ | | Further, I tried the old 3c59x card - same problems persist. Also tried | PC2 as the server - same. nfs-utils version 1.0.6 (Debian Sarge). I sent a | copy of the yesterday's email + new details to nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, | netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org. | | Strange, that nobody is seeing this problem, but it looks pretty bad here. | Unless I missed some necessary update somewhere? The only one that seemed | relevant - nfs-utils on the server(s) from Documentation/Changes I | checked.
I'm sure you checked this, but does mii-tool show that you have negotiated the proper connection to the hub or switch? I found that my 3cXXX and eepro100 cards were negotiating half duplex with the switches and cable modems, causing the throughput to go forth and conjugate the verb "to suck" until I fixed it. -- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |