lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.6.0 NFS-server low to 0 performance
    On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Mike Fedyk wrote:

    > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:46:30AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
    > > It is not just a problem of 2.6 with those specific network configurations
    > > - ftp / http / tftp transfers work fine. E.g. wget of the same file on the
    > > PXA with 2.6.0 from the PC1 with 2.4.21 over http takes about 2s. So, it
    > > is 2.6 + NFS.
    > >
    > > Is it fixed somewhere (2.6.1-rcx?), or what should I try / what further
    > > information is required?
    >
    > You will probably need to look at some tcpdump output to debug the problem...

    Yep, just have done that - well, they differ... First obvious thing that I
    noticed is that 2.6 is trying to read bigger blocks (32K instead of 8K),
    but then - so far I cannot interpret what happens after the start of the
    actual file-read. 2.6 starts getting big delays immediately, even in
    cases, where eventually the file is transferred (2 PCs with 2.6). If
    someone can get some information from the logs, I'll happily send them.
    The bz2 tarball is 50k big, so, not too bad for the list either, but it is
    not a common practice to send compressed attachments to the list, right?
    It's 5M uncompressed.

    Thanks
    Guennadi
    ---
    Guennadi Liakhovetski


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:8.855 / U:0.564 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site