Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Aug 2003 23:08:40 +1000 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [CFT][PATCH] new scheduler policy |
| |
Roger Luethi wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:53:01 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > > >>I haven't run many tests on it - my mind blanked when I tried to >>remember the scores of scheduler "exploits" thrown around. So if >>anyone would like to suggest some, or better still, run some, >>please do so. And be nice, this isn't my type of scheduler :P >> >> > >I timed a pathological benchmark from hell I've been playing with lately. >Three consecutive runs following a fresh boot. Time is in seconds: > >2.4.21 821 21 25 >2.6.0-test3-mm1 724 946 896 >2.6.0-test3-mm1-nick 905 987 997 > >Runtime with ideal scheduling: < 2 seconds (we're thrashing). > >
Cool. Can you post the benchmark source please?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |