Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Fri, 22 Aug 2003 10:55:08 +0200 | From | Roger Luethi <> | Subject | Re: [CFT][PATCH] new scheduler policy |
| |
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:53:01 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > I haven't run many tests on it - my mind blanked when I tried to > remember the scores of scheduler "exploits" thrown around. So if > anyone would like to suggest some, or better still, run some, > please do so. And be nice, this isn't my type of scheduler :P
I timed a pathological benchmark from hell I've been playing with lately. Three consecutive runs following a fresh boot. Time is in seconds:
2.4.21 821 21 25 2.6.0-test3-mm1 724 946 896 2.6.0-test3-mm1-nick 905 987 997
Runtime with ideal scheduling: < 2 seconds (we're thrashing).
If anybody has thrashing test cases closer to the real world, I'd be very interested to learn about them.
Roger - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |