Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Mon, 18 Aug 2003 19:35:36 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: [CFT][PATCH] new scheduler policy |
| |
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 11:53:01AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > As per the latest trend these days, I've done some tinkering with > the cpu scheduler. I have gone in the opposite direction of most > of the recent stuff and come out with something that can be nearly > as good interactivity wise (for me). > I haven't run many tests on it - my mind blanked when I tried to > remember the scores of scheduler "exploits" thrown around. So if > anyone would like to suggest some, or better still, run some, > please do so. And be nice, this isn't my type of scheduler :P > It still does have a few things that need fixing but I thought > I'd get my first hack a bit of exercise. > Its against 2.6.0-test3-mm1
Say, any chance you could spray out a brief explanation of your new heuristics?
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |