Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 27 Jul 2003 11:24:55 +0200 (CEST) | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches |
| |
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> [...] I feel that Con and Ingo work is starting to collide.
they do collide only on the patch level - both change the same code. Otherwise, most of Con's tunings/changes are still valid with my patches applied - and i'd more than encourage Con's work to continue! Watching the tuning work i got the impression that the problem areas are suffering from a lack of infrastructure, not from a lack of tuning. So i introduced 3 new items: accurate statistics, on-runqueue boosting and timeslice granularity. The fact that these items improved certain characteristics (and fixed a couple of corner cases like test-starve.c) prove that it's a step in the right direction. It's definitely not the final step.
Ingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |