Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Sat, 26 Jul 2003 12:20:27 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches |
| |
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 20:19, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> I've no plausible explanation for this; perhaps the only possible one >> is that one of the algorithms that was sped up was behaving badly enough >> to interfere with scheduling.
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 08:31:18PM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > I've also noticed that 2.6.0-test1-wl1A behaves pretty well, given that > no major changes to the CPU scheduler are included.
Okay, now there's a question of narrowing down which piece of it did it. It consists of 38 or so pieces so 6 boots should do it.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |