Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches | From | Felipe Alfaro Solana <> | Date | Sat, 26 Jul 2003 20:31:18 +0200 |
| |
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 20:19, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 11:46:45AM +0200, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote: > > Now that I've tested 2.6.0-test-1-wli (William Lee Irwin's Tree) for over a > > week, I thought about, that the problem might _not_ be only the O(1) > > Scheduler, because -wli has changed almost nothing to the scheduler stuff, > > it's almost 2.6.0-test1 code and running that kernel, my system is _alot_ > > more responsive than 2.6.0-test1 or 2.6.0-test1-mm* or all the Oxint > > scheduler fixes have ever been. > > Strange no? > > P.S.: I've not tested Ingo's G3 scheduler fix yet. More to come. > > I've no plausible explanation for this; perhaps the only possible one > is that one of the algorithms that was sped up was behaving badly enough > to interfere with scheduling.
I've also noticed that 2.6.0-test1-wl1A behaves pretty well, given that no major changes to the CPU scheduler are included.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |