Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 26 Nov 2003 08:23:52 -0800 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.0-test10-mm1 |
| |
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 05:29:00AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> But I do not think that making a single kernel symbol inaccessible is an >> appropriate way of resolving a GPFS licensing dispute. > > well, GFPS is a derived work with or without it. It's just that I remember > we had that agreement about merging it only with the _GPL export. In fact > I'm pretty sure Paul told something about GPLed distributed filesystems from > IBM in that context..
IBM has (at the very least) 2 clustered filesystems that use this. One is GPL'ed, the other (GPFS) is not.
M.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |