Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:07:18 -0800 | From | Mike Fedyk <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.0-test10-mm1 |
| |
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 01:25:05PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 05:29:00AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > But I do not think that making a single kernel symbol inaccessible is an > > appropriate way of resolving a GPFS licensing dispute. > > well, GFPS is a derived work with or without it. It's just that I remember > we had that agreement about merging it only with the _GPL export. In fact > I'm pretty sure Paul told something about GPLed distributed filesystems from > IBM in that context..
Are you trying to say that something that was ported from AIX is a derived work because it has to read kernel internals to get its job done? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |