Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:25:05 +0000 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.0-test10-mm1 |
| |
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 05:29:00AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > But I do not think that making a single kernel symbol inaccessible is an > appropriate way of resolving a GPFS licensing dispute.
well, GFPS is a derived work with or without it. It's just that I remember we had that agreement about merging it only with the _GPL export. In fact I'm pretty sure Paul told something about GPLed distributed filesystems from IBM in that context..
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |