Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 8 Oct 2003 09:36:36 -0700 (PDT) | From | Andre Hedrick <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Poll-based IDE driver |
| |
Does not matter, priority is to get content to platter and the hell with everything else. The reset button is your friend.
Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 03:13:57PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > > > /* Wait for at least N usecs (1 clock per cycle, 10GHz processor = 10000) */ > > /* ToDo : replace this routine based on loops_per_jiffy?? */ > > static inline void dump_udelay(unsigned int num_usec) > > { > > volatile unsigned int i; > > for (i = 0; i < 10000 * num_usec; i++); > > } > > Why not just use udelay() ? The above code cannot possibly do > the right thing on all processors. > > Dave > > -- > Dave Jones http://www.codemonkey.org.uk > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |