Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Fri, 31 Jan 2003 19:40:22 +0300 | From | Hans Reiser <> | Subject | Re: [BENCHMARK] ext3, reiser, jfs, xfs effect on contest |
| |
Dave Jones wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 04:56:07PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote: > > Try running with the -E option for gcc, it might be less CPU intensive, > > and thus a better FS benchmark. > > > > What do you think? > >It's hardly a realistic real-world benchmark if you start nobbling >bits of it though. Not reading the preprocessed output is sure >to bump the benchmark points on an fs optimised for lots of small >writes. > > Dave > > > Sigh. The alternative is to strace the compile, write a perl scipt or something to get just the FS related calls out of it, and then create a program with just the FS related calls. gcc -E sounds easier to me.;-)
-- Hans
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |