Messages in this thread | | | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: [BENCHMARK] ext3, reiser, jfs, xfs effect on contest | Date | Sat, 1 Feb 2003 01:15:06 +1100 |
| |
On Saturday 01 Feb 2003 12:56 am, Hans Reiser wrote: > Try running with the -E option for gcc, it might be less CPU intensive, > and thus a better FS benchmark. > > What do you think?
To be honest I have no idea. I'm not trying to find the filesystem with the greatest throughput, but which utilises the least resources while maintaining throughput. Perhaps we're looking for different things, but I'm open to any suggestions; but they'll have to wait for my waking hours, and for others' comments. These benchmarks are run manually for every stage as they are way out of the scope of the design of contest and therefore time consuming. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |