Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 31 Jan 2003 16:47:11 +0000 | From | Dave Jones <> | Subject | Re: [BENCHMARK] ext3, reiser, jfs, xfs effect on contest |
| |
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 07:40:22PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
> >> Try running with the -E option for gcc, it might be less CPU intensive, > >> and thus a better FS benchmark. > >> What do you think? > >It's hardly a realistic real-world benchmark if you start nobbling > >bits of it though. Not reading the preprocessed output is sure > >to bump the benchmark points on an fs optimised for lots of small > >writes. > Sigh. The alternative is to strace the compile, write a perl scipt or > something to get just the FS related calls out of it, and then create a > program with just the FS related calls. gcc -E sounds easier to me.;-)
It still seems like perverting a benchmark to turn it into dbench to me.
Dave
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |