Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup | Date | Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:29:27 -0800 | From | "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <> |
| |
Can these (MAX_IO_APICS, MAX_APICS) be moved to sub-arch too, instead of replacing CONFIG NUMA by CONFIG NUMAQ?
Thanks, -Venkatesh
> -----Original Message----- > From: Martin J. Bligh [mailto:mbligh@aracnet.com] > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:30 AM > To: Protasevich, Natalie > Cc: Pallipadi, Venkatesh; 'William Lee Irwin III'; Nakajima, > Jun; 'Christoph Hellwig'; 'James Cleverdon'; 'Linux Kernel' > Subject: RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup > > > > I ran into a couple places where CONFIG_X86_NUMA is still > there (replaced > > now with CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ), which disables following defines: > > Yeah, I saw those the other day. Should probably be replaced with > CONFIG_NUMA ... I'll tweak them once I get the last dribbles of Summit > pushed out to Linus. > > Thanks, > > M. > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |