Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:37:30 -0800 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup |
| |
> Can these (MAX_IO_APICS, MAX_APICS) be moved to sub-arch too, instead of
Not easily, at least not without creating a circular dependency problem. Try it ;-)
I guess we chould create another subarch header file just for these if we really have to, but that seem like overkill.
If you can come up with a clean patch (check it compiles on uniproc with and without IO/APIC turned on, and standard SMP as well), I'd really be interested to see it ... would be most helpful
> replacing CONFIG NUMA by CONFIG NUMAQ?
Actually replacing CONFIG_X86_NUMA with CONFIG_NUMA ... and we could do (CONFIG_NUMA || CONFIG_BIGSMP) instead. But you're right, subarch would be much better if you can find a way.
M.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |