lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: v2.6 vs v3.0
On Sun, Sep 29 2002, jbradford@dial.pipex.com wrote:
> > Anyway, people who are having VM trouble with the current 2.5.x series,
> > please _complain_, and tell what your workload is. Don't sit silent and
> > make us think we're good to go.. And if Ingo is right, I'll do the 3.0.x
> > thing.
>
> I think the broken IDE in 2.5.x has meant that it got seriously less
> testing overall than previous development trees :-(. Maybe after
> halloween when it stabilises a bit more we'll get more reports in.

2.5 is definitely desktop stable, so please test it if you can. Until
recently there was a personal show stopper for me, the tasklist
deadline. Now 2.5 is happily running on my desktop as well.

2.5 IDE stability should be just as good as 2.4-ac.

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.692 / U:0.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site