| Subject | Re: v2.6 vs v3.0 | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | 29 Sep 2002 17:24:07 +0100 |
| |
On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 16:26, Matthias Andree wrote: > I personally have the feeling that 2.2.x performed better than 2.4.x > does, but I cannot go figure because I'm using ReiserFS 3.6 file
On low end boxes the benchmarks I did show later 2.4-rmap beats 2.2. 2.0 worked suprisingly well (better than pre-rmap 2.4) and as Stephen claimed the best code was about 2.1.100, 2.2 then dropped badly from that point.
Low memory is of course where rmap does best, so the 2.4-rmap v 2.4 parts of such testing are not actually that useful
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|