lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: v2.6 vs v3.0
    From
    Date
    On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 12:06, Jens Axboe wrote:
    > Nah I'm saying that it's always been solid. Why would I suddenly
    > destabilize it now? :-)
    >

    Close enough. Thank you.

    > > the case, it sure knocks a few of my worries out of the ball park and I
    > > will be that much closer to trying out 2.5.x myself.
    >
    > As always, it's untested territory so a backup may be in order. But I
    > don't view testing 2.5 as any more dangerous as testing 2.4-ac.
    >
    > --
    > Jens Axboe

    I used to religiously test out ac kernels (in the 2.2, 2.3.x and early
    2.4.x days). I don't anymore, so the comparison may not be valid here.
    Anyway, I will try to either test 2.5.x on my router or else find a box
    I can play with that doesnt' have so much important data on it. (I hate
    to say it, but I haven't been able to afford, $$ wise, backup for a few
    years... I know... I can't afford not to either).

    Trever

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:4.341 / U:0.060 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site