Messages in this thread | | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: Remain Calm: Designated initializer patches for 2.5 | Date | Fri, 19 Jul 2002 11:32:51 +1000 |
| |
In message <E17VBcZ-0004oO-00@starship> you write: > On Thursday 18 July 2002 05:22, Rusty Russell wrote: > > GCC has understood both since forever, but the kernel took a wrong > > bet, and we're better off setting a good example for 2.6 before we > > start getting about 10,000 warnings. > > Next time, remember to bet on the ugliest looking one ;-)
I agreed, until I recently did a big grep to find these things. I now concur with the C9X committee. ".foo = " is clearly distinguished from bitfield declarations and labels, which "foo: " isn't.
Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |