lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.1.90 network layer again not responsive
On Wed, 18 Mar 1998, David S. Miller wrote:

>Your suggested change makes delayed ACK's not happen at all, causing
>us to ACK every single data packet all the time, so it is not correct
>either.

Thanks for the interesting info, excuse me for my little knowledge about
tcp implementation and so about the existence of delayed ACKs...

>I welcome someone to come up with a heuristic which preserves the
>current behavior for bulk data transfer, yet ACK's a bit more quickly
>for interactive sessions. ;-) Delayed ACK'ing strategies are an
>interesting problem to solve completely.

Now I have understand the point and I agree with 2.1.90 too ;-).

Andrea[s] Arcangeli


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.086 / U:0.508 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site