Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 Mar 1998 18:01:18 +0100 (CET) | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: 2.1.90 network layer again not responsive |
| |
On Wed, 18 Mar 1998, David S. Miller wrote:
>Your suggested change makes delayed ACK's not happen at all, causing >us to ACK every single data packet all the time, so it is not correct >either.
Thanks for the interesting info, excuse me for my little knowledge about tcp implementation and so about the existence of delayed ACKs...
>I welcome someone to come up with a heuristic which preserves the >current behavior for bulk data transfer, yet ACK's a bit more quickly >for interactive sessions. ;-) Delayed ACK'ing strategies are an >interesting problem to solve completely.
Now I have understand the point and I agree with 2.1.90 too ;-).
Andrea[s] Arcangeli
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |