lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next v6 11/17] dt-bindings: net: pse-pd: Add another way of describing several PSE PIs
> +          pairsets:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> + description:
> + List of phandles, each pointing to the power supply for the
> + corresponding pairset named in 'pairset-names'. This property
> + aligns with IEEE 802.3-2022, Section 33.2.3 and 145.2.4.
> + PSE Pinout Alternatives (as per IEEE 802.3-2022 Table 145\u20133)
> + |-----------|---------------|---------------|---------------|---------------|
> + | Conductor | Alternative A | Alternative A | Alternative B | Alternative B |
> + | | (MDI-X) | (MDI) | (X) | (S) |
> + |-----------|---------------|---------------|---------------|---------------|
> + | 1 | Negative VPSE | Positive VPSE | \u2014 | \u2014 |
> + | 2 | Negative VPSE | Positive VPSE | \u2014 | \u2014 |
> + | 3 | Positive VPSE | Negative VPSE | \u2014 | \u2014 |
> + | 4 | \u2014 | \u2014 | Negative VPSE | Positive VPSE |
> + | 5 | \u2014 | \u2014 | Negative VPSE | Positive VPSE |
> + | 6 | Positive VPSE | Negative VPSE | \u2014 | \u2014 |
> + | 7 | \u2014 | \u2014 | Positive VPSE | Negative VPSE |
> + | 8 | \u2014 | \u2014 | Positive VPSE | Negative VPSE |

Is it possible to avoid \u encoding? Ideally this documentation should
be understandable without having to render it using a toolset. I just
want to use less(1).

Or is this a email problem? Has something converted your UTF-8 file to
this \u notation?

Andrew

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-03-28 13:31    [W:0.488 / U:1.860 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site