Messages in this thread | | | From | Paolo Bonzini <> | Date | Thu, 8 Feb 2024 14:39:03 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/8] KVM: cleanup linux/kvm.h |
| |
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 3:43 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > More cleanups of KVM's main header: > > > > * remove thoroughly obsolete APIs > > > > * move architecture-dependent stuff to uapi/asm/kvm.h > > > > * small cleanups to __KVM_HAVE_* symbols > > Do you have any thoughts on how/when you're going to apply this? The kvmh code > movement is likely going to generate conflicts for any new uAPI, e.g. I know Paul's > Xen series at least conflicts.
It also conflicts (and was partly motivated by) the SEV API cleanups that I am going to post soon.
> A topic branch is probably overkill. Maybe getting this into kvm/next sooner > than later so that kvm/next can be used as a base will suffice?
I can do both, a topic branch is free. But if you think this is in the "if it compiles, apply it", then I can take that as Acked-by and apply it today or tomorrow.
Paolo
| |