lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/8] KVM: cleanup linux/kvm.h
From
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 3:43 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@googlecom> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > More cleanups of KVM's main header:
> > >
> > > * remove thoroughly obsolete APIs
> > >
> > > * move architecture-dependent stuff to uapi/asm/kvm.h
> > >
> > > * small cleanups to __KVM_HAVE_* symbols
> >
> > Do you have any thoughts on how/when you're going to apply this? The kvm.h code
> > movement is likely going to generate conflicts for any new uAPI, e.g. I know Paul's
> > Xen series at least conflicts.
>
> It also conflicts (and was partly motivated by) the SEV API cleanups
> that I am going to post soon.
>
> > A topic branch is probably overkill. Maybe getting this into kvm/next sooner
> > than later so that kvm/next can be used as a base will suffice?
>
> I can do both, a topic branch is free. But if you think this is in the
> "if it compiles, apply it", then I can take that as Acked-by and apply
> it today or tomorrow.

Looks like you already created and merged a topic branch, but for giggles:

Acked-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-27 14:55    [W:0.156 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site