Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:10:28 +0100 | From | Christian Brauner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] filelock: add stubs for new functions when CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING=n |
| |
> Another thought too: "locks_" as a prefix is awfully generic. Might it be > better to rename these new functions with a "filelock_" prefix instead? > That would better distinguish to the casual reader that this is dealing > with a file_lock object. I'm happy to respin the set if that's the > consensus.
If it's just a rename then just point me to a branch I can pull. I don't think it's worth resending just because you effectively did some variant of s/lock_*/filelock_*/g
In any case, folded this one.
| |