lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 2/6] configfs-tsm: Introduce a shared ABI for attestation reports
Caveat: newbie here (just subscribed the linux-coco list) trying to
bridge the abstract language of IETF RATS with an actual
implementation of the architecture.

> +struct tsm_report {
> + struct tsm_desc desc;
> + size_t outblob_len;
> + u8 *outblob;
> + size_t certs_len;
> + u8 *certs;
> +};

Could you clarify the semantics of @certs?

Are these what the IETF calls platform "endorsements" [1], [2]?
Or could a DICE report (which is a cert chain) fall into this bucket too?

If the former, maybe @endorsement_certs (or similar) would minimise ambiguity.

[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9334.html#name-endorsements
[2] https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-dthaler-rats-endorsements-02.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-09-27 18:53    [W:0.141 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site