Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 27 Sep 2023 21:25:54 +0800 | From | Wang Jinchao <> | Subject | Issue: Can padata avoid dealing with CPU-related operations? |
| |
Hello, I have a few questions about the padata code I've been studying recently:
- Why does padata use the WQ_UNBOUND attribute of the workqueue? Because I've noticed a significant maintenance cost related to CPUs. Are there any specific benefits?
- In what scenarios is it necessary to specify a CPU for serial execution, or is ensuring the order sufficient?
In fact, the two questions can be summarized into one: Is it possible to avoid handling CPU-related operations to simplify the code logic?
Thanks.
| |