| Date | Tue, 19 Sep 2023 14:52:03 +0200 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: [patch V3 04/30] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify scan_microcode() |
| |
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 09:57:49AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Make it readable and comprehensible. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 30 ++++++++---------------------- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c > @@ -265,25 +265,19 @@ static void save_microcode_patch(void *d > return; > > /* Save for early loading */ > - intel_ucode_patch = (struct microcode_intel *)p; > + intel_ucode_patch = (struct microcode_intel *)p;
This got committed by mistake.
> -/* > - * Get microcode matching with BSP's model. Only CPUs with the same model as > - * BSP can stay in the platform. > - */ > -static struct microcode_intel * > -scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size, struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool save) > +/* Scan CPIO for microcode matching the boot CPUs family, model, stepping */
"... the boot CPU's... " or simply the "BSP's".
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
|