Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 5 Aug 2023 23:27:00 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: rtq2208: Add Richtek RTQ2208 SubPMIC | From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <> |
| |
On 03/08/2023 08:36, ChiYuan Huang wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 03:13:11PM +0800, Alina Yu wrote: >> Add bindings for Richtek RTQ2208 IC controlled SubPMIC >> >> Signed-off-by: Alina Yu <alina_yu@richtek.com>
>> + >> + richtek,mtp-sel-high: >> + type: boolean >> + description: >> + vout register selection based on this boolean value. >> + false - Using DVS0 register setting to adjust vout >> + true - Using DVS1 register setting to adjust vout >> + >> + regulators: >> + type: object > Just curious. > It seems this PMIC only support buck/ldo ouput. > Since Krzysztof already reviewed it, not sure whether to group it into one node is common or not. > AFAIK, if there's no more function included, to put all on the top level may be better. >> +
Indeed we tend to avoid empty nodes just as a corresponding part to Linux device.
Here, I don't know Rob's and Conor's opinion, but for cases of having more than 2 regulators, having "regulators" node makes sense to me - nicely organizes that piece of DT which can grow quite big. I can also live without the "regulators" node.
Best regards, Krzysztof
| |