Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Miaohe Lin <> | Subject | [PATCH v2] mm/memcg: fix obsolete function name in mem_cgroup_protection() | Date | Thu, 27 Jul 2023 19:59:34 +0800 |
| |
Commit 45c7f7e1ef17 ("mm, memcg: decouple e{low,min} state mutations from protection checks") changed the function name but not the corresponding comment.
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> --- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h index e765d1ff9cbb..3bd00f224224 100644 --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h @@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_protection(struct mem_cgroup *root, /* * There is no reclaim protection applied to a targeted reclaim. * We are special casing this specific case here because - * mem_cgroup_protected calculation is not robust enough to keep + * mem_cgroup_calculate_protection is not robust enough to keep * the protection invariant for calculated effective values for * parallel reclaimers with different reclaim target. This is * especially a problem for tail memcgs (as they have pages on LRU) -- 2.33.0
| |