Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 14 Jul 2023 16:24:10 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: use RMAP_NONE when calling page_add_anon_rmap() | From | David Hildenbrand <> |
| |
On 13.07.23 14:05, Miaohe Lin wrote: > It's more convenient and readable to use RMAP_NONE instead of false when > calling page_add_anon_rmap(). No functional change intended. > > Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> > --- > mm/huge_memory.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c > index 9f3109ed7351..762be2f4244c 100644 > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c > @@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, > entry = pte_mksoft_dirty(entry); > if (uffd_wp) > entry = pte_mkuffd_wp(entry); > - page_add_anon_rmap(page + i, vma, addr, false); > + page_add_anon_rmap(page + i, vma, addr, RMAP_NONE); > } > VM_BUG_ON(!pte_none(ptep_get(pte))); > set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte, entry);
Indeed
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
-- Cheers,
David / dhildenb
| |