Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 14 Jul 2023 15:28:40 +0300 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 04/10] x86/tdx: Make macros of TDCALLs consistent with the spec | From | Nikolay Borisov <> |
| |
On 12.07.23 г. 11:55 ч., Kai Huang wrote: > The TDX spec names all TDCALLs with prefix "TDG". Currently, the kernel > doesn't follow such convention for the macros of those TDCALLs but uses > prefix "TDX_" for all of them. Although it's arguable whether the TDX > spec names those TDCALLs properly, it's better for the kernel to follow > the spec when naming those macros. > > Change all macros of TDCALLs to make them consistent with the spec. As > a bonus, they get distinguished easily from the host-side SEAMCALLs, > which all have prefix "TDH". > > No functional change intended. > > Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com> > --- > arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c > index 5b8056f6c83f..de021df92009 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c > +++ b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c > @@ -15,11 +15,11 @@ > #include <asm/pgtable.h> > > /* TDX module Call Leaf IDs */ > -#define TDX_GET_INFO 1 > -#define TDX_GET_VEINFO 3 > -#define TDX_GET_REPORT 4 > -#define TDX_ACCEPT_PAGE 6 > -#define TDX_WR 8 > +#define TDG_VP_INFO 1 > +#define TDG_VP_VEINFO_GET 3 > +#define TDG_MR_REPORT 4 > +#define TDG_MEM_PAGE_ACCEPT 6 > +#define TDG_VM_WR 8 > What branch is this patch set based off? Because the existing TDX_GET_* defines are in arch/x86/include/asm/shared/tdx.h due to ff40b5769a50f ?
<snip>
| |