lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/msm/dpu: re-introduce dpu core revision to the catalog
From
On 29/06/2023 22:29, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> With [1] dpu core revision was dropped in favor of using the
> compatible string from the device tree to select the dpu catalog
> being used in the device.
>
> This approach works well however also necessitates adding catalog
> entries for small register level details as dpu capabilities and/or
> features bloating the catalog unnecessarily. Examples include but
> are not limited to data_compress, interrupt register set, widebus etc.

Generic note: this description can be moved to the cover letter, it
covers the series intent.

> Introduce the dpu core revision back as an entry to the catalog so that
> we can just use dpu revision checks and enable those bits which
> should be enabled unconditionally and not controlled by a catalog
> and also simplify the changes to do something like:
>
> if (dpu_core_revision > xxxxx && dpu_core_revision < xxxxx)
> enable the bit;
>
> Since dpu's major and minor versions are now separate fields, lets
> drop all the DPU_HW_VER macros.
>
> [1]: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/530891/?series=113910&rev=4

Please use `commit aabbcc ("do this and that")' in the commit messages.

>
> changes in v3:
> - drop DPU step version as features are not changing across steps
> - add core_major_version / core_minor_version to avoid conflicts
> - update the commit text to drop references to the dpu macros
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>

--
With best wishes
Dmitry

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-06-30 02:25    [W:0.063 / U:0.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site