lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Subject[RFC PATCH v2 0/3] wifi locking simplification
Date
The rationale etc. didn't change in v2, so see
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230510160428.175409-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net

In v2 I dropped the workqueue locking patch and consequently
made new wiphy_work and wiphy_delayed_work things.

I kept the pause/resume for the workqueue because not that I
had it, it seemed simpler than keeping track of "should it be
paused" in a separate bool variable to not queue the work when
it shouldn't be ...

Still just serves to illustrate things, I didn't really test it.

johannes


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-05-10 22:14    [W:1.781 / U:0.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site