Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <> | Subject | [PATCH v2 05/14] net/sysctl: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() | Date | Wed, 15 Mar 2023 18:18:52 +0000 |
| |
From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
The kfree_rcu() and kvfree_rcu() macros' single-argument forms are deprecated. Therefore switch to the new kfree_rcu_mightsleep() and kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() variants. The goal is to avoid accidental use of the single-argument forms, which can introduce functionality bugs in atomic contexts and latency bugs in non-atomic contexts.
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> --- net/core/sysctl_net_core.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c b/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c index 74842b453407..782273bb93c2 100644 --- a/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c +++ b/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static int rps_sock_flow_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int write, if (orig_sock_table) { static_branch_dec(&rps_needed); static_branch_dec(&rfs_needed); - kvfree_rcu(orig_sock_table); + kvfree_rcu_mightsleep(orig_sock_table); } } } @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static int flow_limit_cpu_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int write, lockdep_is_held(&flow_limit_update_mutex)); if (cur && !cpumask_test_cpu(i, mask)) { RCU_INIT_POINTER(sd->flow_limit, NULL); - kfree_rcu(cur); + kfree_rcu_mightsleep(cur); } else if (!cur && cpumask_test_cpu(i, mask)) { cur = kzalloc_node(len, GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(i)); -- 2.40.0.rc1.284.g88254d51c5-goog
| |