Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 6 Feb 2023 12:01:44 -0300 | From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] perf test: Support the retire_lat check |
| |
Em Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 11:22:09AM -0800, kan.liang@linux.intel.com escreveu: > From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> > > Add test for the new field for Retire Latency in the X86 specific test.
Is this passing 'perf test' for you?
[root@quaco ~]# perf test -v "x86 sample parsing" 74: x86 Sample parsing : --- start --- test child forked, pid 72526 Samples differ at 'retire_lat' parsing failed for sample_type 0x1000000 test child finished with -1 ---- end ---- x86 Sample parsing: FAILED! [root@quaco ~]#
- Arnaldo > Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> > --- > > New patch since V2 > > tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c > index 690c7c07e90d..a061e8619267 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c > @@ -27,8 +27,10 @@ static bool samples_same(const struct perf_sample *s1, > const struct perf_sample *s2, > u64 type) > { > - if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT) > + if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT) { > COMP(ins_lat); > + COMP(retire_lat); > + } > > return true; > } > @@ -48,6 +50,7 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type) > struct perf_sample sample = { > .weight = 101, > .ins_lat = 102, > + .retire_lat = 103, > }; > struct perf_sample sample_out; > size_t i, sz, bufsz; > -- > 2.35.1 >
--
- Arnaldo
| |