Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 3 Feb 2023 16:48:43 -0800 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Current LKMM patch disposition |
| |
Hello!
Here is what I currently have for LKMM patches:
289e1c89217d4 ("locking/memory-barriers.txt: Improve documentation for writel() example") ebd50e2947de9 ("tools: memory-model: Add rmw-sequences to the LKMM") aae0c8a50d6d3 ("Documentation: Fixed a typo in atomic_t.txt") 9ba7d3b3b826e ("tools: memory-model: Make plain accesses carry dependencies")
Queued for the upcoming (v6.3) merge window.
c7637e2a8a27 ("tools/memory-model: Update some warning labels") 7862199d4df2 ("tools/memory-model: Unify UNLOCK+LOCK pairings to po-unlock-lock-")
Are ready for the next (v6.4) merge window. If there is some reason that they should instead go into v6.3, please let us all know.
a6cd5214b5ba ("tools/memory-model: Document LKMM test procedure")
This goes onto the lkmm-dev pile because it is documenting how to use those scripts.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y9GPVnK6lQbY6vCK@rowland.harvard.edu/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230126134604.2160-3-jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230203201913.2555494-1-joel@joelfernandes.org/ 5d871b280e7f ("tools/memory-model: Add smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock()")
These need review and perhaps further adjustment.
So, am I missing any? Are there any that need to be redirected?
Thanx, Paul
| |